Baklykov M. S. Using GIS to Analyze a Conflict Area: The Example of the Armed Conflict in South Sudan after the Declaration of Independence (2011–2022)

Mikhail S. Baklykov
Ural Federal University
Ekaterinburg, Russia
E-mail: mikhail_baklykov@mail.ru
ORCID: 0009-0001-1974-4267

 Download | Back to the Content № 1. 2024

UDC 94(624)“2011/2022”:004
DOI: 10.58529/2782-6511-2024-3-1-22-35

ABSTRACT. TThe purpose of the study is to highlight the key factors that explain the nature and causes of permanent interreligious and interethnic conflicts in South Sudan in 2011–2022 and using them to classify the territories of South Sudan according to conflict potential. The article describes the experience of using geographic information systems to analyze key factors (ethnic composition of the population, number of refugees, food security index and oil infrastructure) that make up the territory’s conflict potential (in connection with the armed conflict in South Sudan after its declaration of independence). A comprehensive study of historical, demographic, ethnic, religious, economic and social factors that became the causes of the conflict, allows understanding the dynamics of economic processes in Sudan, and applying the experience gained when taking into account other conflicts in the region, including new possible options in Sudan and South Sudan. The author identifies the most conflict-prone areas of South Sudan — Manyo, Maiwut, Melut and Bayley in the Upper Nile states, in which there are interethnic conflicts between the Nuer and Shilluk tribes, low levels of food security, as well as developing oil reserves and oil pipelines. The results of the study can be used in the process of rapid response and proactive actions aimed at preventing crisis situations in those regions of South Sudan where the risk of emerging more complex problems is high.

KEYWORDS: armed conflict, Sudan, South Sudan, civil war in South Sudan, geographic information system.

For citation: Baklykov M. S. Using GIS to Analyze a Conflict Area: The Example of the Armed Conflict in South Sudan after the Declaration of Independence (2011–2022) // Historical Geography Journal. 2024 Vol. 3 № 1 P. 22–35.

REFERENCES

  • LeBrun E. Policing in South Sudan: Transformation Changes and Priorities. HSBA, March, 2017, no. 26 Available at: https://smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/resources/HSBA-IB26 Policing-in-South-Sudan. pdf (accessed: 29.09.2021). (In English).
  • Martell P. First Raise a Flag: How Sudan Won the Longest War but Lost the Peace. Oxford University Press, 2018 (In English).
  • McCrone F. War Crimes and Punishment: The Terrain Compound Attack and Military Accountability in South Sudan, 2016–18. HSBA, August, 2019 Available at: https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/resources/HSBA-BP-Terrain.pdf (accessed: 30.09.2021). (In English).
  • Thyne C. Sudan Civil War. Available at: http://www.uky.edu/~clthyn2/Thyne-Sudan.pdf (accessed: 18.09.2021). (In English).