Historical Geography Journal ISSN 2782-6511

Andrei S. Luchnikov
Perm State University
Perm, Russia
E-mail: sarychev.geo@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0003-3586-5525

Irina S. Rudakova
Secondary Educational School № 3
Perm, Russia
E-mail: rrudakova.irina@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-6986-1656

 Download | Back to the Content № 1. 2023

UDC 94(470.5):913
DOI: 10.58529/2782-6511-2023-2-1-78-89

ABSTRACT. Chusovoy urban district of the Perm Krai is one of the central municipalities in the east of the region, within the so-called Gornozavodsky Prikamye. At present, the city and the territories adjacent to it are included in the official list of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation as a single-industry settlement with a difficult socio-economic situation. One of the reasons for this situation was the reduction in the activity of the city-forming functions, associated with the lack
of a diversified urban economy and the creation of a negative image of the city. Based on the historicalgenetic approach and the identification of the main factors (driving reasons), the article characterizes five stages of the socio-economic development of the Chusovoy lands and the city of Chusovoy as a part of the territorial system of the Perm Krai. The most important events and decisions that have become a turning point in the history of the development of the territories between the Chusovaya and Us’va rivers are indicated. It is determined that consideration of the functions characteristic of the city in the past will help to substantiate the promising directions of its development in the future. When considering the current stage of development of the district, special attention is paid to the implementation of the concept of a new industrial policy, which implies the modernization of traditional functions for the urban economy, the emergence of new types of activities (as part of stimulating small and medium businesses) and post-industrialization, i.e. active use of the historical and industrial heritage of Chusovoy for the development of the tourist and recreational sphere and other modern service activities.

KEYWORDS: functional structure transformation, Chusovoy city, single-industry city, neo-industrialization, post-industrialism

For citation: Luchnikov A. S., Rudakova I. S. Chusovoy Urban District in the Territorial System of the Perm Krai: Historical and Geographical Analysis // Historical Geography Journal. 2023. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 78–89.

REFERENCES

• Chusovoy. Kul’turnyy kod [Chusovoy. Cultural code]. Perm: Liter-A Publ., 2018. (In Russian).
• Komar I. V. Geografiya khozyaystva Urala. Porayonnaya ekonomiko-geograficheskaya kharakteristika [Geography of the Urals Economy. Regional Economic-Geographical Characteristics]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1964. (In Russian).
• Luchnikov A. S. [Periodization of the Socio-Economic Development of the Perm Krai Based on the transformation of the Region’s Functions]. Transformatsiya geograficheskikh protsessov na territorii regionov Rossii i mira. Sovremennyye problemy geograficheskogo obrazovaniya v vuze i shkole: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Transformation of Geographical Processes in the Regions of Russia and the World. Modern Problems of Geographical Education in High and Secondary School: Materials of the International Sci.-Practic. Conf.]. Nizhniy Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorod. gos. ped. un-ta Publ., 2009, pp. 112–116. (In Russian).
• Luchnikov A. S. [Tourism in the Gornozavodsky Region: A Change in the Functions of the Territory and Problems of Development]. Geografiya i turizm [Geography and Tourism], 2019, no. 1, pp. 84–91. (In Russian).
• Nikolaev R. S., Luchnikov A. S. [Spatial Organization of the Regional Transport Network and Its Efficiency (A Case Study of Railway Transport in the Perm Region)]. Geograficheskiy vestnik [Geographical Bulletin], 2018, no. 4 (47), pp. 44–53. DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2018-4-44-53 (In Russian).
• Nikolaev Yu. K. Istoricheskaya geografiya Permskogo kraya. Izbrannyye glavy: ucheb. posobiye [Historical Geography of the Perm Krai. Selected Chapters: Study Guide]. Perm: Izd-vo Perm. gos. nats. issled. un-ta Publ., 2015. (In Russian).
• Oborin V. A. Zaseleniye i osvoyeniye Urala v kontse XI — nachale XVII veka [Settlement and Development of the Urals in the Late 11^th — Early 17^th Century]. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkut. un-ta Publ., 1990. (In Russian).
• Rudakova I. S. [Monotown Chusovoy in the Regional Economic System of the Perm Krai]. Geograficheskoye izucheniye territorial’nykh sistem: materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. studentov, aspirantov, molodykh uchenykh [Geographical Study of Territorial Systems: Materials of All-Russian Sci.-Practic. Conf. Of Students, Postgraduate Students & Young Scientists]. Perm: Izd-vo Perm. gos. nats. issled. un-ta Publ., 2019, pp. 67–74. (In Russian).
• Rudakova I. S. [Territorial and Sectoral Transformations in the Industrial Complexes of the Periphery of the Perm Krai (On the Example of the Lysva-Chusovskoy Microdistrict)]. Sbornik statey XV Bol’shogo geograficheskogo festivalya [Collection of Articles of the 15^th Big Geographical Festival]. Saint Petersburg: Kalligraf Publ., 2019, pp. 1111–1116. (In Russian).

Olga A. Balabeikina
Candidate of Geographic Sciences, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
E-mail: olga8011@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-9520-8880

Valeria Yu. Korobushchenko
Bachelor of Regional Studies, Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
E-mail: parkkeva@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0003-3843-8465

 Download | Back to the Content № 1. 2023

UDC 94(470.22):913
DOI: 10.58529/2782-6511-2023-2-1-90-97

ABSTRACT. The article examines the history of the Republic of Karelia’s settlements, abolished in the late 1950s — early 2020s. Based on the content analysis and information from photographic documents posted in public access, the current state of the territories of abolished rural settlements is described. The authors focus on a specific category of abolished settlements of the Republic of Karelia, whose population in the pre-revolutionary period was more than 150 people. Thus, such settlements as Keret, Kakkarovo, Vashakovo, Lagilamba, Signavolok and Lyadinskaya were considered in the article. Out of these Keret had the longest history and the biggest economic importance in the past, therefore it’s examined with the highest degree of detail. In general, the abolished settlements of the named category have either retained their residential function, being absorbed by neighboring villages as a part of their planning structure, or become abandoned territories with heavily ruined residential buildings. In addition, the abolished settlements have the tendency to become more and more involved in the recreation economy; the most promising areas are sports, kayaking, expeditionary and religious tourism. Considering the popularity of recreation in quite distant places, the demand for guest houses equipped on the basis of restored historical Pomor houses is likely to increase.

KEYWORDS: Republic of Karelia, abolished settlements, georuralistics, Keret, abolition of settlements, tourism and recreation

For citation: Past and present of the abolished settlements in the Republic of Karelia // Historical Geography Journal. 2023. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 90–97.

REFERENCES

• Akhmetova G. F. [Migration Processes in National Republics with Different Levels of Human Development: the Cases of Bashkortostan, Tatarstan and Tuva]. Novye issledovaniia Tuvy [The New Research of Tuva], 2022, no. 2, pp. 53–69. DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.2.4 (In Russian).
• Balabeikina O. A. [Abolished Settlements in Recreation Economy]. Tekhniko-tekhnologicheskiye problemy servisa [Technical and technological problems of service], 2023, no. 1 (63), pp. 98–104. (In Russian).
• Balabeikina O. A., Korobushchenko V. Yu., Mazurenko A. A. [Abolished Settlements of the North-Eastern Districts of the Republic of Karelia (1938–2005)]. Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennyye i fiziko-matematicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of the Pskov State University. Series: Natural and physical and mathematical sciences], 2023, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–12. (In Russian).
• Balabeikina О. А., Karaseva Е. А., Radkevich А. D. [The parish as the center of the daily life of adherents of the Church of England (second half of the XIX century)]. Istoriya povsednevnosti [History of Everyday Life], 2020, no. 3 (15), pp. 46‒55. DOI: 10.35231/25419501_2020_3_46 (In Russian).
• Balabeykina О. А., Kuznetsova Y. А. [The Structural Elements Role of the Orthodox Space in the Tourism and Recreation Development (The Case of the Belomorsky District of the Republic of Karelia)]. Arctic Days in St. Petersburg — 2021: International Scientific Cooperation in the Arctic in the Era of Climate Change: International Sci. and Pract. Conf.: Abstracts. Saint Petersburg: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gidrometeorologicheskiy universitet Publ., 2021, pp. 130–135. (In Russian).
• Berendeeva A. B. The role of the Moscow agglomeration for the socio-economic development of Central Russian regions (part 3). Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness, 2022, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55‒68. DOI: 10.52957/27821927_2022_1_55 (In English).
• Cherkasov А. А. [From a history of the Russian Northern village: Keret’]. Russkaya starina [Russian Eld], 2013, no. 1 (7), pp. 15‒35. (In Russian).
• Dementiev V. S., Kleimenov S. P. [Changes in Rural Settlement in the Territory of the Pskov Region in the Beginning of the XXI Century]. Pskovskiy regionologicheskiy zhurnal [Pskov Journal of Regional Studies], 2018, no. 2 (34), pp. 40–55. (In Russian).
• Ivanchuk D. V. [The Problem of Liquidation of “Unpromising” Villages in the Journalistic Reflection of the Authors of “Village Prose”]. Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo centra UrO RAN [Proceedings of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019, no. 1 (37), pp. 112–119. DOI: 10.19110/1994-5655-2019-1-112-119 (In Russian).
• Ivanov I. А., Vasilyeva Т. V., Krasilnikova I. N., Manakov А. G. [Domestic Tourism in the NWFD Municipalities: Statistical Estimations and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic]. Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society], 2022, vol. 154, no. 5‒6, pp. 59‒72. DOI: 10.31857/S0869607122050044 (In Russian).
• Makhrova А. G., Babkin R. А., Kirillov P. L., Starikova A. V., Sheludkov A. V. [Studying and Estimating Temporary Mobility and Population Pulsations in Space of Modern Russia]. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Geography], 2022, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 332‒352. DOI: 10.31857/S2587556622030104 (In Russian).
• Rumjancev I. N., Smirnova А. А., Tkachenko А. А. [Rural Settlements “Without Population” as a Geographical and Statistical Phenomenon]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Lomonosov Geography Journal], 2019, no. 1, pp. 29–37. (In Russian).
• Savoskul М. S., Alekseev А. I. [Rural-Urban Community in Officially “Non-Existent” Settlement]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Lomonosov Geography Journal], 2019, no. 4, pp. 119–123. (In Russian).
• Savoskul М. S., Alekseev А. I. [Trajectories of Transformation of One Unpromising Village (on the Example of the village Kuzreka in the Tersk district of the Murmansk region)]. Krest’yanovedenie [Russian Peasant Studies], 2021, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 111–123. DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-3-111-123 (In Russian).
• Shvets А. B., Volkhin D. А. [Disappearing Villages of the Crimean Peninsula as a Fragment in the Study of the “Other Crimea”]. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov [Geopolitics and Ecogeodymics of regions], 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 71‒82. (In Russian).